MENIMBANG LITERASI DIGITAL UNTUK PELESTARIAN BAHASA DAN BUDAYA: RETHINKING DIGITAL LITERACY FOR CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC PRESERVATION

Patricius Neonnub

Authors

Patricius Neonnub Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang

Keywords:

literasi digital, kerangka normatif, konteks pascakolonial, pelestarian budaya, keadilan

Abstract

Artikel ini berargumen bahwa model literasi digital yang bersifat tekno-instrumental, pendekatan yang menitikberatkan pada penguasaan keterampilan teknis dalam penggunaan perangkat digital, tidak memadai secara etis dalam konteks pascakolonial dan berpotensi menimbulkan erosi budaya yang terselubung di balik klaim kemajuan. Dengan menjadikan Indonesia sebagai studi kasus, penelitian ini menyerukan perubahan normatif yang membingkai ulang literasi digital sebagai praksis filosofis yang mencakup dimensi etika dan kultural. Melalui penanaman prinsip keadilan dalam setiap proses pembelajaran daring, kerangka yang ditawarkan bertujuan mengarahkan literasi digital pada hasil yang transformatif, sekaligus melestarikan warisan budaya serta melindungi keberlangsungan lebih dari 700 bahasa lokal.

References

Afrina, C., Zulaikha, S. R., & Jumila, J. (2024). The Low Level of Digital Literacy in Indonesia: An Analysis of Online Media Content. Record and Library Journal, 10(2), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V10-I2.2024.374-387

Ahlström, D. (2024). Developing a Rubric-Based Digital Formative Assessment. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A1848586/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Aquinas, T. (2012). Summa Theologiae: Latin-English Edition ( revised by the A. I. for the S. of S. D. Dominican Fathers, Ed.). Emmaus Academic.

Ariel, Y., & Nir, B. (2025). Beyond the Metrics: A Critical Analysis of Digital Success in Western Societies. Philosophy & Technology, 38(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00958-6

Aulia, F., & Tasrif, E. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Digital Literacy within Indonesian Education: Development, Challenges, and Opportunities. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26, 595–611. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i1.pp595-611

Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043

Cockerill, M., McLaughlin, C., & Perry, L. (2024). Indigenous co-design and digital literacies: Sustaining knowledge systems in education. Journal of Learning, Media and Society, 12(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/xxxx

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2011a). Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/abs/

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2011b). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/abs/

Couldry, N., & Mejías, U. A. (2018). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media, 20, 336–349.

Dahur, A. J., & Solosumantro, H. (2024). TANTANGAN DAN PENERAPAN LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM PENDIDIKAN TRANSFORMATIF MANUSIA DI ERA POST-TRUTH. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi (JIPTI). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:274380676

First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2014). Ownership, Control, Access and Possession (OCAP®): The Path to First Nations Information Governance. First Nations Information Governance Centre.

Frazer, R., Carlson, B., & Farrelly, T. (2022). Indigenous articulations of social media and digital assemblages of care. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100038

García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765

Gomez-Galan, J. (2018). Media Education as Theoretical and Practical Paradigm for Digital Literacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. Future Internet, 10(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10030069

Gurumurthy, A., & Chami, N. (2016). Digital justice: A strategy perspective on digital technologies and rights in the network society. IT for Change. https://itforchange.net/digital-justice

Helm, P., Goetzen, A. D., Cernuzzi, L., Diwakar, S., Hume, A., Ruiz-Correa, S., Gommesen, N. J., & Gática-Pérez, D. (2023). LEVERAGING OR EXPLOITING? BREAKING THROUGH DATA COLONIALISM AND ETHONCENTRISM WHEN BUILDING A DIVERSITY-AWARE SOCIAL PLATFORM. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258119864

Istratii, R., & Porter, H. (2018). Decolonising Open Access: A View from the Global South. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2018-0025

Kaelan. (2013). Pendidikan Pancasila. Paradigma.

Kosonen, K. (2005). Education in Local Languages: Policy and Practice in South-East Asia. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000133330

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: Aka the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

Mace, R. (1998). Universal design in housing. Assistive Technology, 10(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955

Mager, A., Eitenberger, M., Winter, J., Prainsack, B., Wendehorst, C., & Arora, P. (2025). Situated ethics: Ethical accountability of local perspectives in global AI ethics. Media, Culture & Society, 47. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251328200

Malone, S. E. (2012). Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education: Implications for Education Policy. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000214309

McInerny, D., & Ashley, B. M. (1999). The common things: Essays on Thomism and education. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:261487668

Mikhaylovskaya, A., & Rouméas, É. (2025). Nurturing Virtues with Digital Democratic Innovations. Philosophy & Technology, 38(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00906-4

Mollema, T. (2024). Decolonial AI as Disenclosure. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12, 574–603. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.122032

OECD. (2016). OECD Factbook 2015-2016: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/factbook-2015-en

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2013). Free, Prior and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/IPeoples/FreePriorandInformedConsent.pdf

Portolés, L. (2025). A Pedagogical Translanguaging Proposal for Trainee Teachers. Education Sciences, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060648

Purba, V. F., Manalu, V. S. B., Bangun, I. B., Bangun, K. T. E. K., & Damanik, I. P. C. (2024). Membangun Integritas Guru: Studi Literatur Tentang Pengaruh Etika Profesi Keguruan Terhadap Kualitas Pendidikan. CIVICS: Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:275364338

Purnawanto, A. T. (2022). Implementasi Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Pembelajaran Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pedagogy, 15(2), 76–87.

Rana, V. (2025). Indigenous Data Sovereignty: A Catalyst for Ethical AI in Business. Business & Society, 64(4), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503241271143

Rohmani, A., Putri, F., & Widodo, A. (2025). Digital Inequality in Indonesia’s 3T Regions: Disability, Justice, and Participation. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

Tijerino, A., & Arandia, D. (2025). Colonial Legacies of Open Science: Indigenous Knowledge and Digital Repositories. PLOS. https://journals.plos.org/

Treviranus, J. (2014). The value of the statistically insignificant. Educause Review, 49(5), 1–12.

United Nations. (2007a). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. UN General Assembly. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html

United Nations. (2007b). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. UN General Assembly. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html

van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Polity Press.

Vatican Council II. (1965). Gaudium et Spes: Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/

Zuhri, S., Suwindia, I. G., Made, I. A., Winangun, A., Mpu, S. N., & Singaraja, K. (2024). Literasi digital dan kecakapan abad ke-21: Analisis komprehensif dari literatur terkini. Education and Social Sciences Review. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:278140228