Implementing of the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) Learning Model for Linear Equation Systems and Matrix Materials for Prospective Mathematics Education Teacher Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to see the learning outcomes of prospective mathematics education teacher students after applying the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) learning model for linear equation systems and matrix. This study uses a quantitative descriptive approach with data collection techniques are test and documentation. Subjects were grouped into three categories, namely subjects with high mathematical abulity, medium, and low mathematical ability. The results showed that the application of the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) learning model gave a good response to learning outcomes with an average of 78.10 in the good category. This can be seen from the student learning outcomes as a whole, both students with high mathematical ability, medium, and low mathematical ability. So, it can be concluded after applying the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) learning model that the overall intake of students when viewed from their mathematical abilities does not cause a wide gap between them.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
RANGE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
References
Bolibaugh, C., & Foster, P. (2021). Implicit statistical learning in naturalistic and instructed morphosyntactic attainment: An aptitude-treatment interaction design.
Cronbach, L. & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions. New York: Irvington.
Fauzan, M.F., Nadhir, L.A., Kustanti, S., Suciani, Kamilah, S. (2022). Pembelajaran Diskusi Kelompok Kecil: Seberapa Efektif kah dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berfikir Kritis pada Siswa?. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 8(3), 1805-1813.
Friskilia, O., & Winata, H. (2018). Regulasi diri (pengaturan diri) sebagai determinan hasil belajar mahasiswa sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran (JPManper), 3(1), 36-43.
Gagne, R.M. (1977). The Conditions of Learning. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Istarani. (2011). Modul Pembelajaran Inovatif. Jakarta: Media Persada.
Maskur, R. (2020). The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 375-383.
Nasution, M. K. (2018). Penggunaan metode pembelajaran dalam peningkatan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Studia Didaktika, 11(01), 9-16.
Reber, A. (1988). Peguin Dictionary of Psychology. Ringwood Victoria: Peguin Book Australia.
Septiana, E., Zubainur, C. M., & Ramli, M. (2021). The enhancement of student’s mathematical understanding ability through the Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) learning model. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1882, No. 1, p. 012072). IOP Publishing.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Uno, H.B. (2007). Model Pembelajaran: Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wirahmad, I. I., & Arifin, Z. (2020). Implementasi, Implementasi Model Pembelajaran ATI (aptitude treatment interaction) Untuk Meninggkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Aktivitas Belajar Mahasiswa Materi Geometri Ruang Kelas XII. IPA. 1 SMA Negeri 4 Kota Bima Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. PEDAGOGOS (Jurnal Pendidikan), 2(1), 46-56.