THE EFFECT OF USING SKIMMING AND SCANNING ON THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN READING COMPREHENSION AT GRADE X IN SMA KAMPUS NOMMENSEN PEMATANGSIANTAR

  • Desta Gloria Siahaan Universitas Timor
  • Marnala Pangaribuan Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
Keywords: skimming, scanning, students’ ability, reading comprehension

Abstract

This study attempted to find out the effect of using skimming and scanning to the students’ ability in reading comprehension at grade X in SMA Kampus Nommensen Pematangsiantar. This research design of is quantitative descriptive. The population of this research is students of SMA Kampus Nommensen Pematangsiantar with cluster sampling data. The researcher gets 60 students as the sample which divided by 30 students as the sample of control class (X-1) and 30 students as the experimental class (X-2). The multiple-choices test is used by the researcher as the instruments to get the data. The test is given to measure the students’ ability in reading comprehension of narrative texts especially in the type of myths. After collected the data, the researcher analyzed the data to find out the effect of skimming and scanning from the calculation scores of pre-test and post-test. Based on the data analysis it is found that the tobserve is higher than ttable (4,54>1,67). So, it can be concluded that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected. In other word, it can be stated that Skimming and Scanning significantly affect the students’ reading comprehension at grade X of SMA Kampus Nommensen Pematangsiar.

References

Anderson, Richard C. (1977). Schema-Directed Processes in Language Comprehension (Technical Report No. 50). Washington DC: National Inst. of Education (DHEW).
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2000). Teaching by Principles An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd edition). California: Longman.
Bruner, Jerome. (1991). Critical Inquiry: The Narrative Construction of Reality. California: The University of Chicago.
Freebody, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Reading Comprehension and The Assessment and Acquisition of World Knowledge (Tech. Rep. No. 249). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Hazel, Paul. (2007). “Narrative: An Introduction”. Mount Pleasant: Swansea Institute of Higher Education.
Kartika. (2012). “Teaching Reading Ability Using Skimming Technique at the Second Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Bandung”. STKIP.
Lana, et.al. (2015). “The Effect of Using Skimming and Scanning Techniques on the Eighth Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement of Recount Texts at SMPN 1 Silo Jember.” Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa I(1):1-4.
Macginite, Walter H. Ed. (1973). Assessment Problem in Reading. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.
Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, Margaret C. (1983). The Instruction of Reading Comprehension (Tech. Rep. No. 297). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Royer, James. M., & Cunningham, Donald J. (1978). On the Theory and Measurement of Reading Comprehension (Technical Report No. 91). Washington D. C: The National Institute of Education.
Sasmita, Andika. (2013). “The Effectiveness of Skimming and Scanning Training on Reading Comprehension Achievement in English”. JP3. Vol. 1 No.12. STKIP.
Shehu, Irena. (2015). “Factors that Influence Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement in the Foreign Language”. Anglisticum Journal (IJLLIS), Volume: 4. Issue pg. 231-235.
Siahaan, D., & Yulita, D. (2021). Improving The Students’ Ability in Reading Narrative Text Through Series of Picture at Grade Ten of Sma Kampus Pematangsiantar. Jurnal Edulanguage, 7(1), 1-9.
Wainwright, Gordon. (2007). How to Read Faster and Recall More. 3rd edition. United Kingdom: How to Books.
Published
2022-04-27
How to Cite
Siahaan, D., & Pangaribuan, M. (2022). THE EFFECT OF USING SKIMMING AND SCANNING ON THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN READING COMPREHENSION AT GRADE X IN SMA KAMPUS NOMMENSEN PEMATANGSIANTAR. Jurnal Edulanguage, 8(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.32938/edulanguage.8.1.2022.11-19

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.