Proportional Reasoning of Junior High School Students in Solving Geometric Similarity Problems Based on Mathematical Disposition

Authors

  • Kartika Rahmania Putri Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Ali Shodikin Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Abdul Halim Abdullah Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32938/jpm.v7i2.9839

Keywords:

mathematical disposition, proportional reasoning, similarity

Abstract

Proportional reasoning is the foundation of mathematical abilities, including algebra, geometry, and statistics, and is influenced by students' mathematical dispositions. The transition from additive to multiplicative reasoning plays a crucial role in problem-solving. This study explores junior high school students' strategies in understanding geometric similarity through a qualitative case study involving three students in Surabaya selected through purposive sampling based on high, medium, and low mathematical dispositions This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method.  The subjects of the study consisted of three eighth-grade students purposively selected to represent high, medium, and low mathematical disposition, allowing an in-depth examination of how different dispositions influence proportional reasoning. The instruments used were similarity problem worksheets and semi-structured interview guidelines. Data were collected through student answers and interviews, then analysed through data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed differences in proportional reasoning strategies according to mathematical disposition: S1 at level 3 (Formal Reasoning), S2 at level 2 (Quantitative Reasoning), and S3 at level 0 (Non-Proportional Reasoning). Proportional reasoning develops when quantity coordination and multiplicative strategies are used in an integrated manner, in line with each student's mathematical disposition. Student with high disposition consistently use ratio-based multiplicative strategies, student with medium disposition use multiplicative strategies, while student with low disposition tend to use additive rules or random approaches. These findings are exploratory and can serve as a basis for studying misconceptions and developing proportional learning.

Author Biography

Ali Shodikin, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science

References

Açikgül, K. (2021). Developing a Two-Tier Proportional Reasoning Skill Test: Validity and Reliability Studies. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 357-375. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.909316.

Aktaş. (2022). A Comparison of Solution Strategies For Proportional And Non-Proportional Problems of Students At Different Education Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 7(18), 1064-1082. Doi: https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.484.

Arican, M., & Özçakir, B. (2021). Facilitating the development of Preservice teachers’ proportional reasoning in geometric similarity problems using augmented reality activities. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 2328-2353. Do: Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10359-1.

Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K. M., & Booth, J. L. (2021). Could Probability be Out of Proportion? Self-Explanation and Example-Based Practice Help Students with Lower Proportional Reasoning Skills Learn Probability. Instructional Science, 49(4), 441-470. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9.

Burgos, M., Chaverri, J., & Muñoz-Escolano, J. M. (2024). Problem Posing in Mathematics Teacher Training: Developing Proportional Reasoning. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 16(4), 35-55. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Problem+Posing+in+Mathematics+Teacher+Training%3a+Developing++Proportional+Reasoning&id=EJ1442353.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Third Edition). Singapore: SAGE Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design (Fourth Edition). California: SAGE Publications. https://pubhtml5.com/enuk/cykh/Creswell_and_Poth%2C_2018%2C_Qualitative_Inquiry_4th/.

Deal, E., Mooney, E., Cullen, A., Kroesch, A., Priya Bajwa, N., Corven, J., & MacDonald, B. (2025). Accessing and Assessing Components of Elementary and Middle School Students’ Mathematical Disposition Through Metaphors. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 17(3), 259-275. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2024.2419291.

Ergene, Ö., & Karaboğaz, Y. (2024). The Effect of The Flipped Classroom Model on Students Proportional Reasoning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 294-311. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202425424.

Fernández, C., Ivars, P., Rojas, F., & Castillo, S. (2024). Desde Estrategias Aditivas Hasta Estrategias Proporcionales: Características Identificadas con Estudiantes de Educación Básica Media y Superior de Ecuador. Educación Matemática, 36(2), 69-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3602.03.

Gea, M. M., Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., & Álvarez-Arroyo, R. (2023). Relating Students’ Proportional Reasoning Level and Their Understanding of Fair Games. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(4), 663-682. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i4.pp663-682.

Gündoğdu, N. S., & Tunç, P. M. (2022). Improving middle school students proportional reasoning through STEM activities. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 164-185. Doi: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213548.

Hernández-Solís, L. A., Batanero, C., & Gea, M. M. (2023). Costa Rican students’ proportional reasoning and comparing probabilities in spinners. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13869.

Ibrahim, Khalil, I. A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2023). Mathematics Learning Orientation: Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability or Creative Disposition?. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 253-276. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp253-276.

Izzatin, M., Waluya, S., Rochmad, Kartono, Dwidayati, N., & Dewi, N. (2021). Students’ Proportional Reasoning in Solving Non-Routine Problems Based on Mathematical Disposition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 4, 1-7. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042114.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (2nd print. 2002). Washington: National Academy Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/5109.

Kumm, M., & Graven, M. H. (2024). Exploring Pre-Service Teachers’ Knowledge of Efficient Calculation Strategies. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1), 1-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1494

Lamberg, T., Grewall, T., & Goyer, A. (2021). Representing Proportional Reasoning Algebraically to Problem Solve. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 412-418. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Representing+Proportional+Reasoning+Algebraically+to+Problem+Solve&id=ED630098.

Langrall, C. W., & Swafford, J. (2000). Three Balloons for Two Dollars: Developing Proportional Reasoning. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(4), 254-261. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.6.4.0254.

Linuhung, N., Purwanto, P., Sukoriyanto, S., Sudirman, S., & Awang, M. I. (2025). Proportional Reasoning: Insights From Students’ Early Attempts At Quantifying In Solving Mathematical Literacy Problems. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(2), 721-736. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.35828.

Linuhung, N., Purwanto, Sukoriyanto, & Sudirman. (2024). Exploring Students’ Proportional Reasoning in Mathematical Literacy Problem Solving: Recognition of Multiplicative Relationship Strategies. Perspectives of Science and Education, 67(1), 243-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.1.13.

Määttä, S., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Halme, H., & McMullen, J. (2022). Guiding Students’ Attention Towards Multiplicative Relations Around Them: A Classroom Intervention. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(1), 36-52. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6363.

Martínez-Juste, S., Arıcan, M., Muñoz-Escolano, J. M., & Oller-Marcén, A. M. (2023). A diagnostic comparison of Spanish and Turkish middle school students’ proportional reasoning. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(1), 65-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231166156.

Nugraha, Y., Sa’dijah, C., Susiswo, S., & Chandra, T. D. (2023). Proportional and Non-Proportional Situation: How to Make Sense of Them. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(2), 355-362. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.2.355.

Öztürk, M., Demir, Ü., & Akkan, Y. (2021). Investigation of Proportional Reasoning Problem Solving Processes of Seventh Grade Students: A Mixed Method Research. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 3(1), 48-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.66.

Patton, M. Q. (2010). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (Third Edition). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962.

Proulx, J. (2023). Relative Reasoning and the Transition from Additive to Multiplicative Thinking in Proportionality. P,roceedings of the forty-fifth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. https://share.google/sUKqDWPtwFgLELgjJ.

Sari, Y. M., Fiangga, S., Milla, Y. I. E., & Puspaningtyas, N. D. (2023). Exploring Students’ Proportional Reasoning in solving Guided-Unguided Area Conservation Problem: A Case of Indonesian students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375-388. Doi: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp375-394.

Shaver, N., & DeJarnette, A. (2024). Documenting the Multiplicative Reasoning of A High School Junior and Senior. The Mathematics Educator, 32(1), 5-38. Https://share.google/cT64UsvoEPfrPn5lc.

Son, J.-W., Jo, S., & Obielodan, F. F. (2022). How Proportional Reasoning Is Presented In U.S. And Korean Mathematics Textbooks. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 210-211. Https://eric.ed.gov/?q=HOW+PROPORTIONAL+REASONING+IS+PRESENTED+IN+U.S.+AND+KOREAN+MATHEMATICS+TEXTBOOKS&id=ED630326.

Stake, R. E. (2010). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications. https://share.google/UmcWi9dgCG6sPEzo4.

Supply, A.-S., Vanluydt, E., Van Dooren, W., & Onghena, P. (2023). Out of proportion or out of context? Comparing 8- to 9-year-olds’ proportional reasoning abilities across fair-sharing, mixtures, and probability contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 371-388. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10212-5

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31