Quality Analysis of Evaluation Instruments for Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding

Authors

  • Abdur Rahman Hakim UIN Suska Riau
  • Rena Revita Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Firza Mufti Aulia Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Ade Irma Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32938/jipm.v11i1.10253

Keywords:

Evaluation instrument, Validity, Reliability, Discrimination power, Difficulty level

Abstract

This study investigates the quality of evaluation instruments developed to measure junior high school students’ mathematical conceptual understanding, with a focus on the topic of numbers. The research employed a quantitative descriptive method involving thirty-two seventh-grade students from a junior high school in Pekanbaru. Data were obtained through essay-based assessments consisting of three items aligned with specific indicators of mathematical conceptual understanding and cognitive domain levels. The analysis examined validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discrimination power. The findings show that all three items achieved high validity, although the overall reliability coefficient was categorized as low. The difficulty level varied, with one item classified as easy and two as moderate. Discrimination power also differed among items, with one item having poor discrimination, one adequate, and one good. These results highlight the importance of conducting systematic quality testing to ensure that evaluation instruments are valid, reliable, and appropriately calibrated for assessing students’ conceptual understanding in mathematics.

   

Author Biographies

Rena Revita, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

 

 

Firza Mufti Aulia, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

 

 

Ade Irma, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

 

 

References

Anwar, A. R. M., Siagian, T. A., Yensy, B., & Nurul, A. (2021). Analisis Kualitas Soal Matematika Penilaian Akhir Semester Ganjil Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 11 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 5(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.5.2.267-280

Arikunto, S. (2021). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (3 ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Hanifah, N. (2014). Perbandingan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda Butir Soal dan Reliabilitas Tes Bentuk Pilihan Ganda Biasa dan Pilihan Ganda Asosiasi Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi. SOSIO e-KONS, 6(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.30998/sosioekons.v6i1.1715

Iskandar, A., & Rizal, M. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Soal di Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Aplikasi TAP. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.15609

Kania, N. (2019). Kualitas Alat Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Matematika (Quality Of Evaluation Tools Of Mathematical Learning Results). Jurnal Theorems, 3(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.31949/th.v3i2.1184

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2018). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Refika Aditama.

Loka, S. (2019). Instrumentasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis: Analisis Reliabilitas, Validitas, Tingkat Kesukaran Dan Daya Beda Butir Soal. Gema Wiralodra, 10(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.31943/gemawiralodra.v10i1.8

Mania, S. (2014). Asesmen Autentik untuk Pembelajaran Aktif dan Kreatif (Implementasi Kurikulum 2013). Alauddin University Press.

Manul, M. G., Susilo, D. A., & Fayeldi, T. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal SPLDV Kelas X. RAINSTEK : Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi, 1(4), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21067/jtst.v1i4.3655

Nuraeni, L., Elshap, D. S., & Kartika, P. (2015). Implementasi Penyusunan Instrumen Evaluasi Yang Digunakan Oleh Widyaiswara Dalam Mengukur Keberhasilan Pelatihan Di Balai Besar Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Kesejahteraan Sosial Lembang. Jurnal Ilmiah P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 2(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.22460/p2m.v2i1p31-39.161

Prijowuntato, S. W. (2016). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Rahmawati, D. O., Effendi, A., & Fatimah, A. T. (2013). Analisis Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Materi Trigonometri. Prosiding Galuh Mathematics National Conference, 3(1), 28–35. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/GAMMA-NC/article/view/12948/6994

Rismen, S., Astuti, S., & Lovia, L. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. Lemma: Letters od Mathematics Education, 7(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2021.v7i2.4911

Solichin, M. (2017). Analisis Daya Beda Soal, Taraf Kesukaran, Validitas Butir Tes, Interpretasi Hasil Tes dan Validitas Ramalan dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan. Dirāsāt: Jurnal Manajemen & Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 192–213. https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v2i2.879

Sudayana, R. (2015). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatis, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Surapranata, S. (2009). Analisis Validitas, Reliabilitas, dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wulan, E. R., & Rusdiana, A. (2015). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Pustaka Setia.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Hakim, A. R., Revita, R., Firza Mufti Aulia, & Irma, A. (2026). Quality Analysis of Evaluation Instruments for Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding. MATH-EDU: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.32938/jipm.v11i1.10253