An Analysis of Students’ Errors Based on Newman’s Error Analysis in Solving Partial Derivative Problems in Calculus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32938/jipm.v11i1.10926Keywords:
students's errors, Newman’s Error Analysis, partial derivatives, calculusAbstract
Understanding student errors in calculus is crucial for improving the quality of mathematics learning. This study analyzes students’ errors in solving partial derivative problems in a calculus course based on the Newman Error Analysis framework. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed. The participants were 20 students from the Mathematics Education Study Program at Universitas Timor enrolled in a calculus course. Data was collected through written tests and unstructured interviews and then analyzed using error categorization and percentage distribution. The findings reveal that the most frequent errors occur at the comprehension, transformation, and process skills stages. Comprehension errors are indicated by students’ difficulties in interpreting the meaning and structure of mathematical expressions. Transformation errors are characterized by students’ inability to convert problems into appropriate mathematical forms or procedures, particularly in selecting suitable strategies. Process skills errors arise when students make computational mistakes despite correctly understanding the problem. In contrast, errors at the reading and encoding stages are relatively infrequent. These results suggest that students’ main difficulties lie in the intermediate stages of problem-solving, where conceptual understanding and procedural fluency are required simultaneously. Therefore, calculus instruction should emphasize conceptual strengthening and incorporate non-routine, higher-order thinking skills-based problems to enhance students’ problem-solving abilities.
References
Ahmad, A., Judijanto, L., Jeranah, Lumbantoruan, J. H., & Abda, M. I. (2024). Barriers and difficulties of students in the mathematics learning process in junior high schools. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(2), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v8i2.74056
Anggara, B., & Solahudin, I. (2022). Newman’s error analysis on students’ solving numerical problems ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Kudus), 5(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.21043/jpmk.v5i2.16560
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. PT Rineka Cipta.
Diana, I. N., Sesanti, N. R., & Rahayu, S. (2026). Analysis of students’ problem-solving errors based on Newman’s stages in group discussions. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17977/2442-3890.1308
Ekasari, A., & Putra, D. J. (2024). Error analysis of learner in solving problem in mathematics course based on Newman error analysis (NEA). Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 9(8), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.17977/2502-471X.1080
Ho, M. F. (2025). Calculus is much more than calculations – Exploring underlying meanings and synergies across chemistry and calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 11, 729–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-026-00293-x
Khasanah, N. D. M., & Febriana, R. (2024). Calculus philosophy in the history of mathematics. Absis Mathematics Education Journal, 6(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.32585/absis.v6i1.4902
Lisa, L., Simamora, E., Mulyono, Napitupulu, E. E., & Panjaitan, A. (2024). Newman’s error analysis (NEA) in solving computational thinking problems on indefinite integral material. Tarbawi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(2), 208–220.
Ningsi, G. P., Nendi, F., Jehadus, E., Sugiarti, L., & Kurnila, V. S. (2022). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal kalkulus integral berdasarkan Newman’s error analysis dan upaya pemberian scaffolding. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 2698–2712. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1469
Putri, A. A., Priatna, N., & Kusnandi, K. (2023). Analysis of student errors in solving mathematics problems based on Newman procedure and providing scaffolding. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v7i2
Rach, S., & Ufer, S. (2020). Which prior mathematical knowledge is necessary for study success in the university entrance phase? Results on a new model of knowledge levels based on a reanalysis of data from existing studies. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6, 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00112-x
Shamsuddin, M., Mahlan, S. B., & Umar, N. (2024). Students’ achievement in mathematics: The relationship between performance in Calculus I and Calculus II. Journal of Computing Research and Innovation, 10(1), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.24191/jcrinn.v10i1.458
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Yang, Z., Yang, X., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Pei, G., & Xu, B. (2021). The emergence of mathematical understanding: Connecting to the closest superordinate and convertible concepts. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 525493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.525493
Youvan, D. C. (2024, August). The a priori development of calculus: A study in abstract mathematical thought. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30417.95845
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sulasri Suddin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







