Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau dari Self-Regulated Learning pada Model Pembelajaran CPS Berbantuan Soal Open-Ended
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jan 31, 2023
Keywords:
kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis, self-regulated learning, creative problem solving, open-ended
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keefektifan pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) berbantuan soal open-ended dan mendeskripsikan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis (KBKM) peserta didik ditinjau dari Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). Metode yang digunakan adalah metode campuran dengan desain eksplanatori sekuensial. Dalam penelitian ini diambil 6 subjek penelitian berdasarkan tingkat SRL pada peserta didik kelas VII D SMP Negeri 1 Tayu Kabupaten Pati tahun pelajaran 2022/2023. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) pembelajaran CPS berbantuan soal open-ended efektif terhadap KBKM peserta didik, dan (2) subjek penelitian dengan kategori SRL tinggi mampu memenuhi semua indikator KBKM, yakni fluency, flexibility, originality, dan elaboration; subjek penelitian dengan kategori SRL sedang hanya memenuhi tiga indikator KBKM, yakni fluency, originality, dan elaboration; subjek penelitian dengan kategori SRL rendah hanya memenuhi satu indikator KBKM, yakni fluency. Rekomendasi kepada peserta didik dengan tingkat SRL rendah yang belum mampu mencapai indikator flexibility, originality dan elaboration dengan memberikan tugas secara mandiri dan melakukan tutor sebaya.
Article Details
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
RANGE: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
References
Agustini, R. Y., Suryadi, D., & Jupri, A. (2017). Construction of Open-Ended Problems for Assessing Elementary Student Mathematical Connection Ability on Plane Geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012148
Ahmar, D. S. (2016). The relationship between Self Regulation with Creative Thinking Ability of Students in Chemistry Class XI IPA at Takalar. Jurnal Sainsmat, 5(1), 7–23.
Al-kreimeen, R. A. (2014). The Relationship Between Individual Creativity and Self-Regulation from Grade Nine Students Viewpoints in Jordan. IPEDR, 78(17), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.7763
Atiyah, A., & Nuraeni, R. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan self-confidence ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 1(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.31980/powermathedu.v1i1.1920
Dahlan, T., Nurhadi, M., & Rohimah, S. M. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa Pgsd. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 2, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v2i1.381
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9
Eladl, A. M., & Polpol, Y. S. (2020). The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Developing Creative Problem Solving and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Intellectually Superior High School Students. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences |, 9(1), 97–106. https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/IJPES
Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi. (2016). Open-ended approach: An effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-esteem in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18
Fattayati, F., Masrukan, M., & Dwijanto, D. (2021). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Regulation Character of Class X Students in Problem Based Learning assisted by Google Classroom in terms of Goal Orientation. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(2), 144–150. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Faturohman, I., Ekasatya, D., & Afriansyah, A. (2020). Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa melalui Creative Problem Solving. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 107–118. http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
Huang, N. tang, Chang, Y. shan, & Chou, C. hui. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(March), 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695
Irawan, A., & Surya, E. (2017). Application of the open ended approach to mathematics learning in the sub-subject of rectangular. International Journal of Sciences : Basic and Applied Research, 33(3), 270–279.
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Kim, S., Choe, I., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The development and evaluation of the effect of creative problem-solving program on young children’s creativity and character. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(August 2018), 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100590
Munahefi, D. N., Kartono, Waluya, B., & Dwijanto. (2022). Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning at Each Level of Mathematical Creative Thinking Skill. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, 36(72), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v36n72a26
Munahefi, D. N., Waluya, S. B., & Rochmad. (2018). Analysis of creative mathematic thinking ability in problem based learning model based on self-regulation learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012161
Munroe, L. (2015). The Open-Ended Approach Framework. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.4.3.97
Ndiung, S., Dantes, N., Ardana, I. M., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2019). Treffinger creative learning model with RME principles on creative thinking skill by considering numerical ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12344a
Nugraheni, N., Waluya, S. B., & Walid, W. (2021). HOTS study primary teacher education UNNES students based on self-regulated learning. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.36359
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Purwaningsih, W. I., & Supriyono, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 6(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.37729/jpse.v6i2.6803
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Situmorang, A. S., & Gultom, S. P. (2018). Desain Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa FKIP UHN. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, 24(2), 103–110. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/penelitian/article/view/13949/11604
Sundayana, R. (2018). Kaitan antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP dalam Pelajaran Matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.262
Surya, E., & Hasibuan, A. M. (2017). The Effect of an Open-Ended Approach on Students ’ Creativity in Fractional International Journal of Sciences : The Effect of an Open-Ended Approach on Students ’ Creativity in Fractional Material. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 34(1), 54–63.
Susanti, E., Waluya, S. B., & Masrukan. (2020). Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability Based on Self-Regulation in Model Eliciting Activity Learning with Performance Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 9(2), 208–215. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/34021
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2010). Creative Problem Solving (CPS Version 6 . 1TM) A Contemporary Framework for Managing Change Creative Problem Solving (CPS). Florida: Center for Creative Learning, Inc. and Creative Problem Solving Group, Inc.
Utami, A. F., Masrukan, & Arifudin. (2014). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Model Taba Berbantuan Geometer’s Sketchpad. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 5(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v5i1.3279
Utami, F., Ainy, C., & Mursyidah, H. (2019). Efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran creative problem solving (cps) terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi luas permukaan bangun ruang sisi datar. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 5(01), 01. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i01.12332
Wanelly, W., & Fauzan, A. (2020). Pengaruh Pendekatan Open Ended dan Gaya Belajar Siswa terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i3.388
Wang, H.-C., Rosé, C. P., & Chang, C.-Y. (2011). Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2011 6:3, 6(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11412-011-9124-X
Yuniarti, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2021). The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640
Ahmar, D. S. (2016). The relationship between Self Regulation with Creative Thinking Ability of Students in Chemistry Class XI IPA at Takalar. Jurnal Sainsmat, 5(1), 7–23.
Al-kreimeen, R. A. (2014). The Relationship Between Individual Creativity and Self-Regulation from Grade Nine Students Viewpoints in Jordan. IPEDR, 78(17), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.7763
Atiyah, A., & Nuraeni, R. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan self-confidence ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 1(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.31980/powermathedu.v1i1.1920
Dahlan, T., Nurhadi, M., & Rohimah, S. M. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Mahasiswa Pgsd. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, 2, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.23969/symmetry.v2i1.381
Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem solving: exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-017-0090-9
Eladl, A. M., & Polpol, Y. S. (2020). The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Developing Creative Problem Solving and Academic Self-Efficacy Among Intellectually Superior High School Students. International Journal of Psycho-Educational Sciences |, 9(1), 97–106. https://www.journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/IJPES
Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi. (2016). Open-ended approach: An effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-esteem in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18
Fattayati, F., Masrukan, M., & Dwijanto, D. (2021). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Regulation Character of Class X Students in Problem Based Learning assisted by Google Classroom in terms of Goal Orientation. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(2), 144–150. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
Faturohman, I., Ekasatya, D., & Afriansyah, A. (2020). Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa melalui Creative Problem Solving. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 107–118. http://journal.institutpendidikan.ac.id/index.php/mosharafa
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
Huang, N. tang, Chang, Y. shan, & Chou, C. hui. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(March), 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695
Irawan, A., & Surya, E. (2017). Application of the open ended approach to mathematics learning in the sub-subject of rectangular. International Journal of Sciences : Basic and Applied Research, 33(3), 270–279.
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027
Kim, S., Choe, I., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The development and evaluation of the effect of creative problem-solving program on young children’s creativity and character. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(August 2018), 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100590
Munahefi, D. N., Kartono, Waluya, B., & Dwijanto. (2022). Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning at Each Level of Mathematical Creative Thinking Skill. Bolema - Mathematics Education Bulletin, 36(72), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v36n72a26
Munahefi, D. N., Waluya, S. B., & Rochmad. (2018). Analysis of creative mathematic thinking ability in problem based learning model based on self-regulation learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012161
Munroe, L. (2015). The Open-Ended Approach Framework. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.4.3.97
Ndiung, S., Dantes, N., Ardana, I. M., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2019). Treffinger creative learning model with RME principles on creative thinking skill by considering numerical ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12344a
Nugraheni, N., Waluya, S. B., & Walid, W. (2021). HOTS study primary teacher education UNNES students based on self-regulated learning. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.36359
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Purwaningsih, W. I., & Supriyono, S. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 6(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.37729/jpse.v6i2.6803
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007
Situmorang, A. S., & Gultom, S. P. (2018). Desain Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Mahasiswa FKIP UHN. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, 24(2), 103–110. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/penelitian/article/view/13949/11604
Sundayana, R. (2018). Kaitan antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP dalam Pelajaran Matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.262
Surya, E., & Hasibuan, A. M. (2017). The Effect of an Open-Ended Approach on Students ’ Creativity in Fractional International Journal of Sciences : The Effect of an Open-Ended Approach on Students ’ Creativity in Fractional Material. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 34(1), 54–63.
Susanti, E., Waluya, S. B., & Masrukan. (2020). Analysis of Creative Thinking Ability Based on Self-Regulation in Model Eliciting Activity Learning with Performance Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 9(2), 208–215. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/34021
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2010). Creative Problem Solving (CPS Version 6 . 1TM) A Contemporary Framework for Managing Change Creative Problem Solving (CPS). Florida: Center for Creative Learning, Inc. and Creative Problem Solving Group, Inc.
Utami, A. F., Masrukan, & Arifudin. (2014). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Model Taba Berbantuan Geometer’s Sketchpad. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 5(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v5i1.3279
Utami, F., Ainy, C., & Mursyidah, H. (2019). Efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran creative problem solving (cps) terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi luas permukaan bangun ruang sisi datar. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 5(01), 01. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v5i01.12332
Wanelly, W., & Fauzan, A. (2020). Pengaruh Pendekatan Open Ended dan Gaya Belajar Siswa terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i3.388
Wang, H.-C., Rosé, C. P., & Chang, C.-Y. (2011). Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2011 6:3, 6(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11412-011-9124-X
Yuniarti, Y., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Kartasasmita, B. G. (2021). The Effectiveness of Open-Ended Problems Based Analytic-Synthetic Learning on the Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/640