AI-Based Interactive Media Creation Training Using Curipod for High School Teachers: Strengthening Digital Literacy

Hani Sulsilah; Ernita Susanti; Rahmat Rizal; Ifa Rifatul Mahmudah

doi:10.32938/jpsh.v4i2.10620

Authors

Hani Sulsilah Universitas Siliwangi
Ernita Susanti Universitas Siliwangi
Rahmat Rizal Universitas Siliwangi
Ifa Rifatul Mahmudah Universitas Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32938/jpsh.v4i2.10620

Keywords:

Active Learning, AI interactive media, Curipod, real-time feedback.

Abstract

The lack of a real-time feedback mechanism in the learning process can lead to undetected misconceptions, delayed reflection, and decreased student participation. This community engagement program was implemented to enrich AI-based interactive learning by utilizing Curipod as a real-time feedback platform, that supported students' understanding and periodic evaluation. The intervention involved nine teachers (n=9) from multiple subject areas at a public senior high school in Pangandaran Regency, Indonesia. The program comprised three phases: 1) pre-activity, 2) training, and 3) monitoring and evaluation. The training followed a three-step sequence: presentation, live demonstration, and assistance. Evaluation included on-site observation during the training, a post-training test, and the interaction rate during the training. The results showed that the average test achievement reached 94,4% with a “very good” category, while the interaction level during the training reached 95%. Participants provided positive responses toward the activity, and eight out of nine participants have implemented Curipod in their classroom learning. Overall, the program was successful and made a tangible contribution to active learning practices. Eight of nine teachers subsequently integrated Curipod into their classroom instruction

References

Bewersdorff, A., Seßler, K., Baur, A., Kasneci, E., & Nerdel, C. (2023). Assessing student errors in experimentation using artificial intelligence and large language models: A comparative study with human raters. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100177

Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(February), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Kochmar, E., Vu, D. Do, Belfer, R., Gupta, V., Serban, I. V., & Pineau, J. (2020). Automated Personalized Feedback Improves Learning Gains in An Intelligent Tutoring System. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12164 LNAI(Ml), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_26

Molin, F., Haelermans, C., Cabus, S., & Groot, W. (2021). Do feedback strategies improve students’ learning gain?-Results of a randomized experiment using polling technology in physics classrooms. Computers and Education, 175(July), 104339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104339

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three Types of Interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659

Muslem, A., Mustafa, F., Rahayu, R. R., & Eridafithri. (2024). The Preferred Use of Google Classroom Features for Online Learning in Indonesian EFL Classes. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(8), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.8.2896

OECD. (2022). PISA PISA 2022 Results Malaysia. Journal Pendidikan, 10.

OECD. (2023). Education in Indonesia a decade on Transforming Education in Indonesia: Examining the landscape of current reforms. Directorate for Education and Skills, 88, 5.

Pahi, K., Hawlader, S., Hicks, E., Zaman, A., & Phan, V. (2024). Enhancing active learning through collaboration between human teachers and generative AI. Computers and Education Open, 6(February), 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100183

Plasencia, J. (2023). Use of practice tests with immediate feedback in an undergraduate molecular biology course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 51(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21695

Presley, R., Cumberland, D. M., & Rose, K. (2023). A Comparison of Cognitive and Social Presence in Online Graduate Courses: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous Modalities. Online Learning Journal, 27(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3046

Rahmad, R., Adria Wirda, M., Berutu, N., Lumbantoruan, W., & Sintong, M. (2019). Google classroom implementation in Indonesian higher education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012153

Rizal, R., Surahman, E., Aripin, H., & Maulidah, R. (2024). Problem-Based Learning Management System (PBLMS): A Mobile Learning Application to Facilitate Creative Thinking Skills (CTS) of Prospective Physics Teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 18(01), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i01.46417

Rocliffe, P., Tapia-Serrano, M. A., Garcia-Gonzalez, L., Adamakis, M., Walsh, L., Bannon, A., Mulhall, E., Sherwin, I., O’ Keeffe, B. T., Mannix-McNamara, P., & MacDonncha, C. (2024). The Impact of Typical School Provision of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sports on Adolescent Physical Health: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. In Adolescent Research Review (Vol. 9, Issue 4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-023-00231-x

Sahito, Z. H., Khoso, F. J., & Phulpoto, J. (2025). The Effectiveness of Active Learning Strategies in Enhancing Student Engagement and Academic Performance. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 5(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.62843/jssr.v5i1.471

Suendarti, M., & Virgana, V. (2022). Elevating natural science learning achievement: Cooperative learning and learning interest. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i1.20419

Taxipulati, S., & Lu, H. D. (2021). The Influence of Feedback Content and Feedback Time on Multimedia Learning Achievement of College Students and Its Mechanism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(December), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706821

Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2024). Putting ICAP to the test: how technology-enhanced learning activities are related to cognitive and affective-motivational learning outcomes in higher education. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66069-y

Widodo, Y. B., & Akbar, K. F. (2024). Effectiveness of Technology Use in Indonesian High Schools: Student Engagement, School Capacity, Teacher Performance. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(1), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i1.442

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(January), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Yavuz, O., & Arslan, A. (2018). Cooperative learning in acquisition of the english language skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 591–600. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.591